EXAMPLE- 2: INDIRECT METHOD OF PROOF | PROOF BY CONTRADICTION | INCONSISTENCY OF PREMISES |

PREDICATE CALCULUS | QUANTIFIERS | TYPES OF QUANTIFIERS | REPRESENT THE STATEMENTS IN SYMBOLIC FORM

INDIRECT METHOD OF PROOF | PROOF BY CONTRADICTION | INCONSISTENCY OF PREMISES | DISCRETE MATHEMATICS

EXAMPLE-1 : CONSISTENCY OF PREMISES | INCONSISTENCY OF PREMISES | CONSISTENCY OF PREMISES | DMS |

EXAMPLE-5: INDIRECT METHOD OF PROOF FOR PREDICATE LOGIC | PROOF BY CONTRADICTION | INDIRECT METHOD |

Propositional Logic − Logical Equivalences

EXAMPLE-2 : REPRESENT THE STATEMENTS IN SYMBOLIC FORM USING QUANTIFIERS | QUANTIFIERS | PREDICATES

INFERENCE THEORY | VALID CONCLUSION | VALID CONCLUSION USING TRUTH TABLE METHOD | FORMAL PROOF |

CONSISTENCY OF PREMISES | INCONSISTENCY OF PREMISES | PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC | DISCRETE MATHEMATICS |

EXAMPLE - 4 : EXAMPLE PROBLEM ON RULE CP | INFERENCE RULES | DISCRETE MATHEMATICS | RULE P | RULE T

Indirect method of proof || Proof by Contradiction|| Inconsistency Premises || DMS || MFCS

(TAMIL) INFERENCE THEORY PROBLEM 5

EXAMPLE - 7 : EXAMPLE PROBLEM ON INFERENCE RULES | RULE P | RULE T | INFERENCE RULES | DMS | MFCS |

EXAMPLE - 6 : EXAMPLE PROBLEM ON RULE CP | INFERENCE RULES | DISCRETE MATHEMATICS | RULE P | RULE T

PART-2: INTRODUCTION TO PREDICATE LOGIC | PREDICATE CALCULUS | PREDICATE | M PLACE PREDICATE |

Logical Equivalence with out using truth table examples or equivalent formulas examples

Consistency and Inconsistency of Premises || DMS || MFCS || Discrete Mathematics

EXAMPLE-1: INFERENCE RULES FOR PREDICATE LOGIC | RULE - US | RULE - ES | RULE - UG | RULE - EG |

Discrete Mathematics | MA3354 |Unit 1|Logic & Proofs|Theory of inferences in Tamil | Indirect method

Indirect Method of Proof Examples || Lesson 28 || Discrete Math & Graph Theory ||